On Mar 26, 2010, at 4:16 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Is it a crime to use the full word "Processor"? At least on my machine, > > the output width is still far less than 80 characters, so the full word > > should be no problem. But I don't know if there are other strange > > topologies out there that would take up more space...? (it certainly would > > in the graphic output...) > > The graphical output is a reason to at least have a function that > returns P, yes, else the output is very large.
How about "Processor" in the text outputs, and a shorter version in the graphic output? Shorten "processor" to: Prcssr Prcsr Procr Procsr ...? -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
