On Apr 18, 2014:12:46 PM, at 12:46 PM, Nitin Bahadur <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> If the study showed that OF-Config did not meet the requirements, that is >> fine but I heard no one said that. >> > > > On Feb 5th, Alia Atlas said: > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg01243.html > > > Gap Analysis for different Protocols: I2RS needs to select a protocol to > > use. I believe that we have volunteers for discussing RESTCONF. > > We'd welcome hearing from others who can provide at least a presentation > > for review before IETF and preferably a quick draft as well. > > On Feb 27th, Ed Crabbe said: > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg01291.html > > The I2RS agenda has been posted. > > Those who think OF-Config should have been a candidate, should have presented > at the IETF; or at least started a discussion on the mailing list. > > My 2 cents > Nitin I agree %100 with your 2 cents. --Tom > _______________________________________________ > i2rs mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
