> But the point is that a more realistic choice should be between these two > choices.
Why? :-) Russ _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protocol and mo... Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protocol an... Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protoco... Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protocol an... Nitin Bahadur
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protoco... Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS pr... Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS pr... Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protoco... Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protocol an... Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protocol an... Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protocol an... Russ White
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protocol and model Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protocol and mo... Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protocol an... Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protocol and model Jan Medved (jmedved)
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protocol and model Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protocol and mo... Jan Medved (jmedved)
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protocol an... Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protoco... Jan Medved (jmedved)
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS pr... Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS pr... Dean Bogdanovic
