Nitin:
If it was to be a candidate, did you know someone who wanted to be the chief supporter in the IETF? Sue From: Nitin Bahadur [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 12:47 PM To: [email protected]; Susan Hares Cc: [email protected]; Edward Crabbe; Dean Bogdanovic; Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protocol and model If the study showed that OF-Config did not meet the requirements, that is fine but I heard no one said that. On Feb 5th, Alia Atlas said: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg01243.html > Gap Analysis for different Protocols: I2RS needs to select a protocol to use. I believe that we have volunteers for discussing RESTCONF. > We'd welcome hearing from others who can provide at least a presentation for review before IETF and preferably a quick draft as well. On Feb 27th, Ed Crabbe said: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg01291.html > The I2RS agenda has been posted. Those who think OF-Config should have been a candidate, should have presented at the IETF; or at least started a discussion on the mailing list. My 2 cents Nitin
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
