This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call for: draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00 (2/2 to 2/16/2015). You can access the draft at:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt The current I2RS charter states: "The I2RS working group works to develop a high-level architecture that describes the basic building-blocks necessary to enable the specific use cases, and that will lead to an understanding of the abstract informational models and requirements for encodings and protocols for the I2RS interfaces." This draft is part of setting the requirements for the I2RS protocol. As Andy has noted in early email, there may be nothing specific to I2RS in draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt. It may be something that should be just a part of the netconf/restconf functionality. As part of the adoption of this draft, the I2RS chairs would like to hear your opinion of Andy's statement. Andy also suggests that draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00 should also be part of the I2RS requirements. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg02252.html [chair hat-off] IMHO, I think Andy is correct. [chair-hat on ]. If the WG approves adoption of draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt and the WG feels these drafts should be netmod WG drafts with I2RS holding a requirement drafts, the I2RS chairs will do the right thing to make it happen. If enough people comment that draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00 should be part of the I2RS requirements, we will do a WG adoption of call for this requirement. Sue Hares
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
