support

From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, February 2, 2015 at 4:30 PM
To: Susan Hares <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] 2 week WG Adoption call (2/2 to 2/16/2015) - 
draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00

Support.

On Feb 2, 2015:6:53 PM, at 6:53 PM, Susan Hares 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call for:  
draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00  (2/2 to 2/16/2015).  You can access 
the draft at:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt

The current I2RS charter states:

“The I2RS working group works to develop a high-level architecture that 
describes the basic building-blocks necessary to enable the specific use  
cases, and that will lead to an understanding of the abstract informational 
models and requirements for encodings and protocols for the I2RS interfaces.”

This draft is part of setting the requirements for the I2RS protocol.

As Andy has noted in early email, there may be nothing specific to I2RS in 
draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt.  It may be something that should 
be just a part of the netconf/restconf functionality.  As part of the adoption 
of this draft, the I2RS chairs would like to hear your opinion of Andy’s 
statement.  Andy also suggests that draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00 should 
also be part of the I2RS requirements.

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg02252.html

[chair hat-off] IMHO, I think Andy is correct. [chair-hat on ].

If the WG approves adoption of draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt and 
the WG feels these drafts should be netmod WG drafts with I2RS holding a 
requirement drafts, the I2RS chairs will do the right thing to make it happen.  
 If enough people comment that draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00 should be 
part of the I2RS requirements, we will do a WG adoption of call for this 
requirement.

Sue Hares


_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

Reply via email to