I agree, this modification will make it more accurate. As mentioned earlier on the thread, this is a -00 draft and we should expect that some revisions will be needed. Thanks --- Alex
-----Original Message----- From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eric Voit (evoit) Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 10:19 AM To: Juergen Schoenwaelder Cc: 'Jeffrey Haas'; [email protected]; Susan Hares Subject: Re: [i2rs] 2 week WG Adoption call (2/2 to 2/16/2015) - draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00 > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 05:47:04PM +0000, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote: > > >> o limited support for pushed notification of changes. (Currently > > >> notifications are for configuration data only. And even then, > > >> subscription mechanisms for such notifications are > > >> undefined.) > > <snip> > > > I understand all that I think but I still think the text quoted > > > above is incorrect and this should be fixed. I am not looking for > > > long explanation, a simple "we will change that text to '...'" > > > would be more > efficient. > > > > I can just delete everything between the parenthesis. Would that be > sufficient? > > This leaves it open what 'limited' means, which I think is not good either. > Perhaps: > > o change notifications only for data residing in configuration > datastores Works for me. I will insert that into "-01" Eric > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
