On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 05:47:04PM +0000, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote: > >> o limited support for pushed notification of changes. (Currently > >> notifications are for configuration data only. And even then, > >> subscription mechanisms for such notifications are undefined.) > <snip> > > I understand all that I think but I still think the text quoted above is > > incorrect and > > this should be fixed. I am not looking for long explanation, a simple "we > > will > > change that text to '...'" would be more efficient. > > I can just delete everything between the parenthesis. Would that be > sufficient?
This leaves it open what 'limited' means, which I think is not good either. Perhaps: o change notifications only for data residing in configuration datastores /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
