Support.

> On Feb 2, 2015:6:53 PM, at 6:53 PM, Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call for:  
> draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00  (2/2 to 2/16/2015).  You can access 
> the draft at: 
>  
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt 
> <http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt>
>  
> The current I2RS charter states: 
>  
> “The I2RS working group works to develop a high-level architecture that 
> describes the basic building-blocks necessary to enable the specific use  
> cases, and that will lead to an understanding of the abstract informational 
> models and requirements for encodings and protocols for the I2RS interfaces.”
>  
> This draft is part of setting the requirements for the I2RS protocol.  
>  
> As Andy has noted in early email, there may be nothing specific to I2RS in 
> draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt.  It may be something that should 
> be just a part of the netconf/restconf functionality.  As part of the 
> adoption of this draft, the I2RS chairs would like to hear your opinion of 
> Andy’s statement.  Andy also suggests that 
> draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00 should also be part of the I2RS 
> requirements. 
>  
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg02252.html 
> <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg02252.html>
>  
> [chair hat-off] IMHO, I think Andy is correct. [chair-hat on ]. 
>  
> If the WG approves adoption of draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt 
> and the WG feels these drafts should be netmod WG drafts with I2RS holding a 
> requirement drafts, the I2RS chairs will do the right thing to make it 
> happen.   If enough people comment that draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00 
> should be part of the I2RS requirements, we will do a WG adoption of call for 
> this requirement.  
>  
> Sue Hares
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> i2rs mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

Reply via email to