support - it's a good starting point. On 2 Feb 2015, at 23:53, Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote:
> This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call for: > draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00 (2/2 to 2/16/2015). You can access > the draft at: > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt > > The current I2RS charter states: > > “The I2RS working group works to develop a high-level architecture that > describes the basic building-blocks necessary to enable the specific use > cases, and that will lead to an understanding of the abstract informational > models and requirements for encodings and protocols for the I2RS interfaces.” > > This draft is part of setting the requirements for the I2RS protocol. > > As Andy has noted in early email, there may be nothing specific to I2RS in > draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt. It may be something that should > be just a part of the netconf/restconf functionality. As part of the > adoption of this draft, the I2RS chairs would like to hear your opinion of > Andy’s statement. Andy also suggests that > draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00 should also be part of the I2RS > requirements. > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg02252.html > > [chair hat-off] IMHO, I think Andy is correct. [chair-hat on ]. > > If the WG approves adoption of draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00.txt > and the WG feels these drafts should be netmod WG drafts with I2RS holding a > requirement drafts, the I2RS chairs will do the right thing to make it > happen. If enough people comment that draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00 > should be part of the I2RS requirements, we will do a WG adoption of call for > this requirement. > > Sue Hares > > > _______________________________________________ > i2rs mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
