On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 03:54:14PM -0500, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > > On Mar 26, 2015, at 3:51 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 07:46:47PM +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> can someone explain how the model described here relates to the > >> routing model described in the core routing configuration data model? > >> > >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-17 > >> > >> Any major differences or conflicts one should be aware of? > >> > > > > I am still waiting for a response to this question. > > There is strong overlap. > > I2RS requires ephemeral state. Until we know what ephemeral state > implementation looks like, we have some difficulty in fully analyzing > overlap. At best, we may be able to refactor common schema into a shared > grouping. >
Even if you believe you need to reinvent the wheel, at least key abstractions better be the same. Are they? /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
