On Mar 26, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 26, 2015, at 4:43 PM, Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote: > >> No, ietf-routing now barely defines anything besides the basic hierarchy, >> everything else is expected to be added via augments, and I believe you can >> do it now, even before the ephemeral state issue is resolved. > > Part of the feedback in the Venn diagrams describing possible implementations > of I2RS state cover the case of ephemeral state augmenting configuration > state. > > Feedback from some netconf members seemed to suggest this was one of the less > preferred cases to potential implementation.
For reference from the proceedings: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/slides/slides-91-i2rs-1.pdf
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
