Juergen: Thank you for this excellent question, and for your patience in waiting for a response. Due to travel, the Design Team requested time to discuss their response. I also wanted to talk to Lada. The Design Team did not think the modules conflicted.
My brief conversation with Lada suggests that the I2RS RIB Model and the draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-17 did not conflict. I hope that you will provide information if you think the two yang modules conflict. In your review, will you remember the key question I asked the WG which is "Does this yang module encode the RIB Information Model the I2RS WG has already adopted." Sue -----Original Message----- From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Juergen Schoenwaelder Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 4:51 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [i2rs] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-i2rs-rib-data-model-02 ( On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 07:46:47PM +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > Hi, > > can someone explain how the model described here relates to the > routing model described in the core routing configuration data model? > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-17 > > Any major differences or conflicts one should be aware of? > I am still waiting for a response to this question. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
