> On 26 Mar 2015, at 16:52, Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mar 26, 2015, at 4:43 PM, Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote: > >> No, ietf-routing now barely defines anything besides the basic hierarchy, >> everything else is expected to be added via augments, and I believe you can >> do it now, even before the ephemeral state issue is resolved. > > Part of the feedback in the Venn diagrams describing possible implementations > of I2RS state cover the case of ephemeral state augmenting configuration > state. > > Feedback from some netconf members seemed to suggest this was one of the less > preferred cases to potential implementation.
At any rate, my understanding is that the same data must be present in the RIB schema under “routing-state”, no matter whether they coincide with ephemeral data or not. Lada > > -- Jeff > > > > > -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
