On Mar 26, 2015, at 4:59 PM, Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote: >> Feedback from some netconf members seemed to suggest this was one of the >> less preferred cases to potential implementation. > > At any rate, my understanding is that the same data must be present in the > RIB schema under “routing-state”, no matter whether they coincide with > ephemeral data or not.
That would be good and is expected. However, it would imply i2rs is a routing protocol and thus derived from the routing-protocol identity. That behavior is not clear until we know how the state is added to the network element. -- Jeff
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
