Interesting, but a bit early to score, I think. The first is more a rollout announcement than a case study.
The second two seem to be preannouncements - just sales folks crowing over their latest victory. I also note that Superior Court Stanislaus County may no longer be able to easily share information with the rest of the court system. If so, how does that serve the greater good? Can you say 'distributed'? Or, perhaps, just another example of a government system being way behind? My $0.02 (before taxes) -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Green Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 7:59 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Windows 1, Mainframe 0 .. Repost - I forgot the other articles Again, for those that track and care about such matters... http://www.techworld.com/opsys/features/index.cfm?featureid=1453 http://www.bobsguide.com/guide/news/9367.html -or- http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/May2005/18/c0623.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
