Ted, I don't get it either. That line of thought carried to an extreme is...well, let's just say I shudder at the thought that if those lines of reasoning were being extended to actuarial tables, government decisions on labor statistics, etc, what the outcome might be.
Straight face? Heck, how about a clean conscience? Bob -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 8:00 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: IBM VSAM Statistics are often Bogus ... Just because they are not written when something BAD happens is NOT a reason to see them as invalid or useless. ... I don't get it! Invalid data is invalid data! We make enough bad decisions with valid data. How can you say that with a straight face? -teD LEGAL DISCLAIMER The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Seeing Beyond Money is a service mark of SunTrust Banks, Inc. [ST:XCL] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
