NON-SMS PDSE was a god send for system components and system programmers and
was one of the most recent examples of real skunk works success between
users and IBM developers.
Since the advent of the SMSPDSE address space PDSE's use little ECSA.
We use PDSE heavily including as the default libraries for our busy source
repositories and you can be sure these libraries are shared.
There have been some issues with PDSE but they have devoted a lot of effort
to continue to improve RAS with apparent success.
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
Performance and Availability Management
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(office) 301.986.3574
The laws of nature should appear the same to all free moving observers. -
Albert Einstein
-----Original Message-----
I used to think they were the kitty's butt, until IBM put in support for
non-SMS (post hoc, ergo propter hoc?).
It may be a bit of an exaggeration, or urban legend, but I thought I heard
that IBM has over 100 PTF's in the last year for PDSE's.
I know they consume (E?)CSA, and are easibly corrupted when shared.
-teD
<>
====================
This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution of this email/fax is prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all paper and electronic
copies of the original message.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
