>ISTM, this restriction is still in place. I ran isrddn the other day and it >flagged a dataset in the concatenation that had a smaller blocksize than those >following it. >We reblocked that data set and isrddn did not complain.
Did ISRDDN complain because it is a TRUE problem? Or, did it complain because that portion of the code is out of date? Until I see a true problem posted (and documented), I'm going to continue to believe this issue was 'fixed' aeons ago. I've not seen this occur in years! - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
