On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:08:50 -0400, Klein, Kenneth wrote:
>ISTM, this restriction is still in place. I ran isrddn the other day and
>it flagged a dataset in the concatenation that had a smaller blocksize
>than those following it. We reblocked that data set and isrddn did not
>complain.
Really? I've seen ISRDDN report other kinds of error, like a mix of FB and
VB. I jost looked and saw this (dsnames omitted):
Blksz Lrecl RCFM Org Act DDname
4080 80 FB > ISPCTL0
4080 80 FB > ISPCTL1
4080 80 FB > ISPCTL2
4080 80 FB > ISPCTL3
> ISPLLIB
18432 ** U PO >
18432 ** U PO >
18432 ** U PO >
27998 ** U PO >
6144 ** U PO >
32760 ** U PO >
32760 ** U PO >
18432 ** U PO >
> ISPMLIB
3600 80 FB PO >
3120 80 FB PO >
3120 80 FB PO >
27920 80 FB PO >
27920 80 FB PO >
27920 80 FB PO >
> ISPPLIB
27920 80 FB PO >
3120 80 FB PO >
3120 80 FB PO >
27920 80 FB PO >
27920 80 FB PO >
27920 80 FB PO >
27920 80 FB PO >
27920 80 FB PO >
6160 80 FB PO > ISPPROF
> ISPSLIB
3120 80 FB PO >
27920 80 FB PO >
27920 80 FB PO >
27920 80 FB PO >
27920 80 FB PO >
> ISPTLIB
27920 80 FB PO >
27920 80 FB PO >
27920 80 FB PO >
> SYSEXEC
27920 80 FB PO >
32720 80 FB LIB >
27920 80 FB PO >
27920 80 FB PO >
27920 80 FB PO >
> SYSHELP
27920 80 FB PO >
27920 80 FB PO >
> SYSPROC
32720 80 FB LIB >
27920 80 FB PO >
27920 80 FB PO >
--
Tom Marchant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
