In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 09/13/2006
at 02:13 PM, David Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Because our maintenance is cumulative, not incremental.
It's not my dog.
> - That means that all prior maintenance has to be removed
> before the new maintenance file can be successfully
> APPLY'd.
No it doesn't. There may be something in your packaging that forces
it, but it's not the mere fact of being a levelset.
>As I said in my initial post, the advantage of cumulative
>maintenance over incremental maintenance is that customers, when
>they eventually get around to applying maintenance (a far less
>frequent event than I would like),
Could it be less frequent precisely because it is cumulative?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
