In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 10/20/2006
at 08:24 AM, "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>FSVO "reentrant". Actually, being in the LPA usually implies "not
>self modifying", that is the program will not attempt to modify its
>own storage. But, at least in the past, there were sneaky ways around
>this. But they are anathema as far as I am concerned.
AOL. I always objected vehemently to putting nonrefreshable code in
the MLPA. Is it still a PARMLIB option, or is the MLPA now
unconditionally page protected?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
