Edward Jaffe wrote: > If REFR programs are automatically protected by a future operating > system release, why would you care into which subpool they are loaded? > I prefer SP 252 because it isn't fetch protected, thus allowing the > modules' storage to be "read" in any key. But, that's a different story > altogether.
You're right, I prefer SP 252 also for historical reasons, but I don't really care about the sub-pool number, as long as the memory into which the load-modules are loaded can't be messed with. -- Gilbert Saint-Flour GSF Software http://gsf-soft.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
