Adam,
While at times they did slip usually GUIDE/SHARE sent them a notice
and most of the time IBM got the message. They (IBM) made a statement
at OCO time that all messages were to be documented For the most part
for a few years they were . Now they have reneged on their word and
it seems I am the only one holding their feet to the fire. Where is
SHARE? they are afraid to raise their voice to IBM. Share is now a
gofor for IBM. The management at SHARE is afraid to say one word to
IBM as they might pull out. Frankly it would be better if SHARE got a
spine but I don't see it happening any time soon.
ED
On Mar 21, 2007, at 9:25 PM, Gerhard Adam wrote:
Yes but don't forget IBM used to have a messages and codes for
COBOL now they expect you to do a vulcan mind meld with the
compiler:)
Remember I said, "some of the best" ... I never meant perfect. :)
Adam
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
