thank you for the info John - i will pass it along. but i think that it is just because they do not want to be bothered setting up DAE.
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 9:18 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Changing name of SYS1.DUMP datasets > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Barkow, Eileen > > that is the question i asked of the person in charge of this > one lpar (we merged with another agency and this one belonged > to them). the person said that the reason they do not want to > use dynamic dump allocation is because: > > 1. TSO DSCAN (or something they run to display dumps) does > not support it IPCS does, and it's free....... > 2. they cannot limit the number of dumps taken as you can > when the sys1.dump datasets fill up and messages are > displayed to delete subsequent dumps. DAE is supposed to be able to do that...... -jc- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
