On 21 Dec 2007 11:41:16 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Gould) wrote: >Interesting option there. I briefly browsed through Phil's online >copy of the suit. One of the "facts" IBM alleges (IIRC ) or was that >PSI (it was a long read) but one of the parties said that IBM made >this public at one time and now can't complain someone used this >information. I think I am saying that correctly. So if they win >(PSI), IBM would *NEVER* say another word again as it might be >construed as public information. I think that it would mean the POPS >would evaporate overnight.
With the amount of laws there are these days, we can see almost daily in Fark or the local paper where the law is an ass. I read somewhere that Rockefeller Center closes its roads one day per year - to keep them from turning public. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
