In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/13/2008
at 06:53 PM, Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>REFRPROT is much safer and more useful.
That depends on what you are tying to accomplish. If you want to eliminate
all code that is not refreshables but is linked with RENT, then
CSVRENTPROTECT is what you need.
When you have two options that do the same thing then it's useful to
discuss which is safer and more useful; when they do *different* things
then such discussions are meaningless.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
