When they do similar things, yet one of them is supported by IBM and the other is not, then the discussion of "more useful" may not be as valuable, but the question of "safer" is clearly answered.
Wayne Driscoll Product Developer JME Software LLC NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Rexx external assembler functions and reentrancy In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/13/2008 at 06:53 PM, Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >REFRPROT is much safer and more useful. That depends on what you are tying to accomplish. If you want to eliminate all code that is not refreshables but is linked with RENT, then CSVRENTPROTECT is what you need. When you have two options that do the same thing then it's useful to discuss which is safer and more useful; when they do *different* things then such discussions are meaningless. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
