I guess there is a need to increase the funds required for those GOLDEN
parachutes???
Howard Brazee wrote:
On 29 Jan 2008 07:54:59 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scrood
Blued) wrote:
No, but every one of those employees who had achieved a work/life balance
that contained less than 5 hours of overtime a week have to now *start to
make family-killing demands on their time* to break even on weekly take home
pay. To achieve equivalent total compensation is likely impossible, there
will not be enough overtime hours to do that.
It is quite possible that IBM created a cost-neutral solution, and
will pay out the same amount of money for the same amount of work -
for the company.
If so, some people will gain and some people will lose (this is the
nature of choices). Those who put in more than the average amount
of overtime will earn more, and those who put in less than the average
amount of overtime will earn less.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
