On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:31:51 -0400, Lizette Koehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Depending on your level of JES2 you may want to look at using PROCLIB >statements in JES2 rather than coding DD statements. Or have the users >start using JCLLIBs. > I hope they are running at least z/OS 1.2 by now! But I agree that it should be done to help recover from a problem like this or prevent it entirely by using JCLLIB. RACF (or other) should be used to protect JES2 defined proclibs (either dynamic or JCL defined) by only allowing ALTER authority to a select few who understand that JES2 proclibs aren't ENQed. If shop standards or politics won't allow that, then I have seen shops define the proclibs to an arbitrary long running STC with DISP=SHR so they would get ENQed. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
