We gave up when the first "not SYS1" started and just use IBM's names. I think that in the long run, we're ahead of the naming convention game.
> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL > Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 7:52 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Workable Mainframe Debuggers > > >I often see SYS1.ISF.SISF* , SYS1.ISP.SISP*, SYS1.GIM.SGIM* etc. even > though the MLQ is redundant. > > I agree with the redundancy argument; what's wrong with each product > having the same library name(s) at every site? > > > >Hard to change that stuff in a production environment... well, maybe not > hard, just a PITA when there are batch processes and people with their own > clists etc. > > In production, standards should be enforced, so it won't become a PITA. > > If unsupported software breaks, you get to keep both parts. > > - > Too busy driving to stop for gas! > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
