>I often see SYS1.ISF.SISF* , SYS1.ISP.SISP*, SYS1.GIM.SGIM* etc. even though >the MLQ is redundant.
I agree with the redundancy argument; what's wrong with each product having the same library name(s) at every site? >Hard to change that stuff in a production environment... well, maybe not hard, >just a PITA when there are batch processes and people with their own clists >etc. In production, standards should be enforced, so it won't become a PITA. If unsupported software breaks, you get to keep both parts. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
