On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:19:01 +0000, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: . > >My point was: why do people do things in a non-standard (unsupported) way. Which you snipped out. >
Then you missed the point. The point is that there is nothing non-standard or unsupported in naming the data sets I was referring to: SYS1.ISP.SISP*, SYS1.ISF.SISF* or SYS1.SISP*, SYS1.SISF* or ISP.SISP*, ISF.SISF* (and others). IBM default names are the last examples. The other 2 examples are both common (with SYS1.something being the most common from what I have seen). Again, changing it once it has already been done one way or the other is what I was referring to as being a PITA. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
