>Then you missed the point. The point is that there is nothing non-standard or >unsupported in naming the data sets I was referring to:
My point had nothing to do with that, except for redundant qualifiers. My point was why were production jobs/users pointing to SYS1 datasets directly? I elabourated in a subsequent post. I'm sorry I wasn't clear to begin with. The true point to communication is not to ensure you're understood; rather to ensure you're not mis-understood! - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
