>You always believe that your every word is golden, and go ballistic when >people only quote the part that they are commenting on.
1. I'm probably going to regret responding. 2. I do not think my words are golden; I'm simply trying to clarify, since I did not articulate my position well enough to be understood. 3. I was not ballistic; I didn't take any of the comments personally. 4. I don't know why you have it in for me, as I'm only trying to help. Also, I do not make cryptic and obscure comments that do not add to the knowledge being diseminated. Though, as anybody else, I've been known to be wrong, and, unlike some, I usually acknowledge and appologise. 5. It must be nice to be able to read minds and infer what people think, even when you're dead wrong. 6. This the last time I am responding to you on any post, because it appears to me that you deliberately goad people, rather than contribute positively. 7. I'm still investigating why you keep slipping through my e-mail filters. 8. If you cannot contribute constructively, I would suggest that you do not at all. I know I'm not the only one with that opinion. Now back to real information. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
