Dave, With regrests, I think it would be better to go back to the beginning of your base SERVERPAC and then reinstall the maint with the correct JOBLIB/STEPLIB.
I am not sure if a REDO on all of the fixes would work as well. (Yes I did have to regress my SMPE libraries to the beginning and rerun the APPLY. I had the same number of PTFs that got regressed) I think it is safer to go back to the base serverpac and then go forward. Of course I did a FDR Dump of all of my serverpac libraries before doing maint, so it was an easy process to regress them. Lizette > > Thank you, of course I should have done that. What I get for doing >one of these only every two or three years. And I missed it in the PSP >and/or migration doc. > My next question is: Since I did get 835 PTFs on (all that didn't >involve NUCLEUS), can I go forward, or should I start over one more >time? Or restore from back up to the pre APPLY state and run again. Or >SMP/E restore? > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of Lizette Koehler >> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 4:46 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Some insight on 1.9 install >> >> I ran into that one. You MUST run your SMPE Assembles pointing to the >z/OS >> V1.9 ASSEMBLER AND BINDER libraries. They need to be JOBLIB or >STEPLIB in >> your SMPE libraries. This is documented in the z/OS V1.9 PSP bucket >> >> Otherwise the IPL blows up. >> >> Lizette >> >> >> > >> > I'll probably open an ETR in the morning, but I hope for some >> > thoughts here. My Serverpac order is now several months old. So, I >> > uploaded a report and ordered maintenance to current level. After >some >> > work with excludes, I get an APPLY CHECK with rc=0. >> > >> > So, I run the APPLY and I get several (more than a dozen) like >this: >> > >> > >> > >> > UA36789 HBB7740 GIM23911E 56 LINK-EDIT PROCESSING FAILED FOR >> > MODULE ITTTL IN LMOD IEANUC01 IN THE NUCLEUS >> > >> > LIBRARY. THE RETURN CODE WAS >12. >> > THE SEQUENCE NUMBER WAS 000522. THE SYSPRINT >> > >> > FILE WAS SMP00111. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Messages as above, all the other PTFs (anything that doesn't touch >> > NUCLEUS) go on clean. What am I missing? >> > >> > >> > >> > As you might imagine, I'm a little reluctant to good forward with >> > potential nucleus problems. >> > >> > >> > >> > Running on a 1.7 driving system. Damn, should I be using the 1.9 >> > MIGLIB? >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
