Do not let anyone tell you that you cannot load MS Office 2003 on Vista.
They told a very good friend of mine that and he ended up selling a
brand new copy of Office 2003 cheap and buying Office 2007.  I purchased
a PC with Vista and it accepted Office 2003 w/o problems.

Microsoft renamed many things in Vista and it sometimes takes a little
hunting to find something, but it's there.  If you have too hard of a
time you can change the theme to Windows Classic, that will help a
little bit.

Norris Jackson

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pinnacle
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 10:47 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Microsoft Windows Vista vs. z/OS

<rant>

I just got a new ThinkPad with Microsoft Windows Vista installed.  The 
culture shock has been enough that I felt compelled to post this.  One
of 
Conley's Corollaries is that "No PC software upgrade is complete until
the 
user interface has been entirely rewritten."  Never was that corollary
more 
true than with Windows Vista.  The interface, while visually stunning,
bears 
little resemblance to any Windows operating system preceding it.
Standard 
system utilities are completely different, and located in completely 
different places.  THEY TOOK THE MENU BAR!  THE WHOLE F'ING MENU BAR! 
(quick, somebody throw me a fifth of JD).  This change alone is
staggering. 
The menu bar has been there for 20 years, and now poof!  It's gone with
a 
wave of Bill's mighty hand.  I can't begin to imagine how many BILLIONS,
if 
not TRILLIONS of dollars in lost productivity are going to be flushed
down 
the toilet when corporations around the world roll out this POS.  And
we'll 
all just take it like the lemmings we are.

If a z/OS developer had ever tried to foist this much change on the 
mainframe platform, that developer and their product would have died a
quick 
death.  The mainframe environment would never stand for the kind of
changes 
we see Microsoft and their PC ilk routinely throw at us.  IBM still
leads 
the way in protecting the customer's investment (except when they don't,

like killing FLEX-ES for PWD, but I digress), a concept that Microsoft
has 
never embraced.  This is one of the mainframe's biggest strengths, and
it 
was really brought home for me by Windows Vista.  Can't wait to see how
much 
PC software I have to go out and buy for Vista compatibility (yeehaw).

For those of you yet to experience Windows Vista, you're in for a treat 
(not).  Gimme ISPF any day.  I can still run my 20-year old dialogs, but

Windows changes its interface every 20 minutes.  I'll stick with the 
mainframe.

</rant>

Regards,
Tom Conley





 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to