On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:08:02 -0500 "Tony B." <[email protected]> wrote:
:>At the risk of missing the obvious, why aren't IBM, CA, BMC, et al, having :>the same concerns? Copyrights are copyrights. And they recognize that the risks way outweigh the rewards. And it would be hard to describe this "feature" of the product. :>-----Original Message----- :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf :>Of shai hess :>Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:21 PM :>To: [email protected] :>Subject: Re: Any products to protect MVS software from cracking and reverse :>engineering? :>>>Worry about improving the product and forget about trying to build :>internal "protection" code. :>That what I have done. I have improved the code (you well come to give it a :>second try) and now I am thinking about the next step (do I need to protect :>the code as it is done in open system platform?). -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
