In
<ofe978e42c.d9098222-on88257a93.00553714-88257a93.0055c...@sce.com>,
on 10/10/2012
at 08:36 AM, Skip Robinson <[email protected]> said:
>I've said previously that a DOC record requiring action should be
>(re)classified (or accompanied by) an ACTION hold.
Typically a DOC hold is there because of new messages; an ACTION hold
for that would be inappropriate. Similarly, if the DOC hold is because
of new function that is off by default the ACTION is again
inappropriate.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
