"Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Typically a DOC hold is there because of new messages; an ACTION hold for > that would be inappropriate.
Not necessarily; it could affect the way message automation table entries are coded. -- Jeremy C B Nicoll - my opinions are my own. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
