DOC related to message content has its own category: AO . . . JO.Skip Robinson SCE Infrastructure Technology Services Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 626-302-7535 Office 323-715-0595 Mobile [email protected]
From: "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 10/11/2012 01:44 PM Subject: Re: SMP/E question Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> In <ofe978e42c.d9098222-on88257a93.00553714-88257a93.0055c...@sce.com>, on 10/10/2012 at 08:36 AM, Skip Robinson <[email protected]> said: >I've said previously that a DOC record requiring action should be >(re)classified (or accompanied by) an ACTION hold. Typically a DOC hold is there because of new messages; an ACTION hold for that would be inappropriate. Similarly, if the DOC hold is because of new function that is off by default the ACTION is again inappropriate. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
