In <[email protected]>, on 10/12/2012 at 11:38 PM, Jeremy Nicoll - ls mainframes <[email protected]> said:
>"Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Typically a DOC hold is there because of new messages; an ACTION hold for >> that would be inappropriate. >Not necessarily; it could affect the way message automation table >entries are coded. Is new function considered action? You might want to exploit the new messages, but you might also ignore them. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
