I'm curious about how they used RECORD or STRUC R to do what they wanted. I haven't played with it, but my initial impression was that STRUCTURE RECORD might work if you were going from z/OS FTP to another z/OS FTP, but that the structure information might be lost if there were other non-MVS systems in the path. I could be wrong about that. I'd like to know. Regards, --Roger
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Gilbert Cardenas < [email protected]> wrote: > You are correct Roger, the terse/ftp/ftp/unterse did work. It does add an > extra layer of complexity to the process though and is not as > straightforward as an FTP to pc and then back to MF. > > I'm am not privy to all of the information around why they want to do this > but apparently, the OP has already found another possible solution and that > is to use the STRucture RECORD type. > > Apparently the RECORD type adds a End-of-Record (x'FF01') but they think > they can work around this. > > I was just trying to help a friend with this delimna but they seemed to > possibly have found a work around using STRucture RECORD. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
