This video (w/o the youtube subtitles) would have been a very good presentation during the z16 launch event.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von Pommier, Rex Gesendet: Wednesday, April 06, 2022 18:39 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [EXTERNAL] z16 video As the OP, I guess it kind of surprised me that there were so many mistakes in the CC. But watching a bit of it again, it appears as though it is youtube's CC software that is messing it up, not a part of the video itself. So while still annoying, I can see the issue better, that the generic CC will simply do a "best guess" on things that are subjective, like cache vs cash. Rex -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Matt Hogstrom Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2022 11:07 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] z16 video To me it’s not a big deal as I can cope. Personally I hate to see everything go to the lowest common denominator like UX where color would be beneficial to the broadest segment of the market but contrasts are preferred for the color blind I didn’t intend to go off topic. Ed’s suggestion was good. Choose the interface that makes sense and not all of them have high fidelity. Such is life Matt Hogstrom +1 (919) 656-0564 > On Apr 6, 2022, at 11:46, René Jansen <[email protected]> wrote: > > I can sympathize because after 10 years in a Rolling Stones coverband I am > also missing some of the high part of the frequency spectrum; also, I always > have subtitles on because reading draws less cpu cycles (of the wetware) than > listening; also you can do lots of other things while glancing at the screen > with the refresh cycle of the subtitles. > > But a more important point, I think, is the disrespect for the auditory > impaired. I always wonder how angry I would be would if I really were deaf. I > think it is part of the general dumbification of the world: image if the > speaker really said ‘cash’ and would mangle the different plexes - IBM would > be outraged and fire people or agencies. In the sixties there were high hopes > of automatic translation, and it seemed to be more complex than people could > imagine. Now we have to settle for ’statistic’ translation. There were high > hopes for automated close captioning, but guess what, it is more complex than > people thought. > > I don’t think we should settle for this: just give one knowledgeable person a > job, and make sure it is done the right way. If one deaf manager decides to > buy a Z16, you run a profit already. > More or less the same goes for the ‘web conferencing’ - every company that > manufactures plastic wastebaskets can afford an unreachable web conference - > but an IT company that needs to keep a reputation of always available and > high resilience … make sure you are in control of that appearance. > > René. > > >> On 6 Apr 2022, at 17:25, Matt Hogstrom <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Unless your deaf (well, in one ear and hard of hearing in the other) >> like me and then you wonder if CICSplex is really SYSPLEX >> >> Matt Hogstrom >> [email protected] >> >> “It may be cognitive, but, it ain’t intuitive." >> — Hogstrom >> >>>> On Apr 6, 2022, at 11:03 AM, Ed Jaffe <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 4/6/2022 5:26 AM, Pommier, Rex wrote: >>>> Oh I got the accidental joke alright (I actually thought it was funny the >>>> first couple times I saw it), but there were enough other transcription >>>> errors that the humor left me. Like I said, I was being picky but it did >>>> detract from an otherwise fine video. >>> >>> All closed captioning has errors. >>> >>> The easiest way to shield yourself from having to read it is to simply turn >>> it off. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
