Well, here's the real deal: //BPXAS JOB 1,MSGCLASS=Z //BPXAS PROC //*-------------------------------------------------------------------- //* Note: This is a started JOB now, so the MSGCLASS can be set. //* Z is purged automatically. Change to X if you want to //* enable the output. To revert to the IBM version in //* SYS1.PROCLIB, just rename this member in USER.PROCLIB. //*-------------------------------------------------------------------- //IEFPROC EXEC PGM=IEFIIC,DPRTY=12,PARM=',,&GETWORK,BPXPRJRW' //********************************************************************/ //* */ //*01* PROCEDURE NAME : BPXAS */ //* */ //*01* FUNCTION: Used to start the MVS initiator */ //* */ //*01* COMPONENT: SC1B6 (Initiator) */ //* */ //*01* DISTRIBUTION LIBRARY: SYS1.PROCLIB */ //********************************************************************/ // PEND // EXEC BPXAS //
This is member named BPXAS in a library allocated to //IEFPDSI in the master JCL. But, the library is also allocated to JES2 in //PROC00. I thought it was coming from the former, but now I'm not sure. sas On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 9:54 PM Ed Jaffe <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/10/2023 6:31 PM, Gibney, Dave wrote: > > Actually, you can have a > > Job card in the PROC in PROCLIB but it's not as flexible as using > IEFJOBS. > > I experimented with this and learned that you are correct. However, I > encountered two JCL errors in the process. > > The first was: > > IEFC005I PROC STATEMENT WITHOUT MATCHING PEND STATEMENT > > So I added the PEND statement, then I received: > > IEFC607I JOB HAS NO STEPS > > So I added an EXEC PROC=procname card after the newly-added PEND and the > STC did indeed start. > > Thanks for the edjumacation... > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
