What’s CUI? A container platform?

> On 28 May 2023, at 9:57 pm, W Mainframe 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,Just some few words..:I hate zosmf and zowe... :)And yes... I have some 
> good applications running on CUI... No plans to migrate... :)Dan
> 
> 
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> 
> 
> On Sunday, May 28, 2023, 8:26 AM, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The problem is not the D&D interface; the Devil is in the details. The real 
> issue is the design, and what IBM has chosen to hide, rather than CLI vs 
> panels vs GUI.
> 
> It is perfectly possible to write a program with a scriptable GUI; anybody 
> remember SOM, DSOM and WPS. A GUI is a good servant but a poor master, and 
> even with a GUI it is easy to provide visibility to things that you have 
> automated.
> 
> 
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of 
> Jack Zukt [[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2023 5:31 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: zOSMF
> 
> The real problem, as I see it, is that drag and drop interfaces move you
> away from the need to know what you are doing. A long time ago, the first
> MVS install that I did on my own, took me a few months to do it. I was
> doing it under VM/XA and I did a few complete back to square one at the
> time, as I was not pressed for time. At the time I had about two years of
> MVS experience. I did read a lot of MVS and JES2 reading, you know,
> installation guides,  references, customization and such. When I finnaly
> was satisfied with the system I knew a lot more than when I started.
> The point that I am trying to make is that you may be able to do a z/OS
> install using zosmf knowing next to nothing of z/OS, but with that
> knowledge you will not be able to debug any kind of problem that you will
> get in your way.
> So, I suppose that the next step will be some kind of IA doing the install
> and problem solving.
> That makes me glad that I am not so far away from retirement.
> Jack
> 
>> On Wed, May 24, 2023, 21:21 Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I enjoy learning new things, but I'd rather not replace good tools with
>> bad just because the bad tools are in fashion.
>> 
>> ________________________________________
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf
>> of Harris Randy - Nashville <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 4:17 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: zOSMF
>> 
>> I had a choice 30 years ago to go into the pc, server, network side of IT
>> or go the mainframe direction.
>> I chose the mainframe because I liked it better.
>> I'm not a GUI fan.
>> It's not Windows.
>> I do have grey hair.
>> I do understand the need to atract younger people to the mainframe.
>> What I don't understand is why IBM would take away a working method
>> (SERVERPAC) and force
>> those of us with grey to learn something new when we well know how to use
>> what we already have in place.
>> And, a lot of us looking at retirement not toooo far away.
>> 
>> Randy Harris
>> P 615-344-3244
>> C 662-401-8552
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf
>> Of Phil Smith III
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 1:58 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: {EXTERNAL} Re: Re: zOSMF
>> 
>> CAUTION! This email originated from outside of our organization. DO NOT
>> CLICK links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
>> the content is safe.
>> 
>> Beverly Caldwell wrote:
>>> If zosmf is the answer what the hell was the question?
>> 
>> I’m going to take that as a straight question. I assume the question was,
>> “How do we make z/OS easier to install and maintain for folks who don’t
>> have any grey hair yet?”
>> 
>> This is essentially the same question that led to GUIs in general. The
>> problem is that it’s not trivial to answer—putting some lipstick on the pig
>> doesn’t always do it: sometimes you need to restructure the pig.
>> <possibly insert “waste of time and it annoys the pig” joke>
>> 
>> 
>> I’m reminded of the Windows version of the Relay/Gold terminal emulator,
>> which was acquired by VM Systems Group when I was there. Under certain SDLC
>> error conditions, it would drop out of the Windows UI into a DOS error
>> dialog. Which was not really recoverable, since it needed someone to press
>> a key. At one point a customer was considering buying a power strip that
>> plugged into a phone line and could be called to cause it to power cycle,
>> as they had an automated process that would be stopped when this error
>> occurred. Talk about a Rube Goldberg solution! I’m sure the real fix was a
>> single line of code somewhere, but finding that was non-trivial, of course.
>> Especially since Relay/Gold was written in x86 assembler, a non-standard
>> variant from a dead company. So there were no diagnostic tools to speak of.
>> And as a tiny vendor, we didn’t have the hardware to even simulate the
>> error…Good times. /s
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
>> to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to