I guess it would depend on if you have MPF automating the message or not. If no automation is present, then they should be the same.
Brian On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 12:55:01 +0000, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote: >Are the rules the same for what is logged by WTO versus what WTO displays on >the terminal for WTPMSG? > > >-- >Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz >http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 >עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי >נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר > > > > >________________________________________ >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of >Peter Relson <[email protected]> >Sent: Sunday, December 7, 2025 8:25 PM >To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: WTO message truncation > > >External Message: Use Caution > > >If the WTO limit is not 126 characters for a single line WTO, I'd be very >surprised. > >If someone has seen it documented tht the limit is 128 (unless it is counting >126 characters plus 2 bytes for the length), please point out that (likely >flawed) documentation so that it can be corrected. > >PeterReelson > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
