In
<CAE1XxDH57SkYrr7F-TKpjxdxcs_vOefqaFPm6RD=lnzlm5z...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 07/10/2013
at 02:44 PM, John Gilmore <[email protected]> said:
>Let me also take this opportunity to add my personal view that
>base-register-displacement schemes are at best obsolescent in new
>code.
Nonsense; they're still needed for referring to data in dynamic
storage. My general rule on such matters is that you have to cut the
bird at the joints.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
