In <[email protected]>, on 09/13/2013
at 12:51 PM, Clark Morris <[email protected]> said:
>My complaint, poorly stated is that locally attached 327x devices
>had to be NON-SNA in order to be used as consoles.
Given that there was only a single address for a local SNA cluster,
what alternative do you suggest to having an access method deal with
them? Making the CONSOLE address space an SSCP would seem to be too
expensive.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
