> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 1:13 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: z/OS Platform Software Products on ... Tape?
> 
> On Tue, 12 May 2015 11:33:45 -0700, retired mainframer wrote:
> >
> >    ...  We could disable the OMVS and ISHELL TSO commands and no one would
> notice.
> >
> Might they still use Rexx "address SYSCALLL ..."?

We do have some system admin EXECs to tweak a few HFS/ZFS things after IBM or 
ISV has installed some maintenance in the file system.
 
> >There is no user data in any of our HFS/ZFS datasets.
> >
> Unless they put it there.

OK, I'll rephrase.  None of our users has ever put any data into a ZFS or HFS.
 
> >If we could go from DVD directly to SMPPTFIN and SMPHOLD, ...
> >
> What about RELFILEs?

Processing RELFILEs from DVD should be no more complicated than processing them 
from tape now.  They are stored in DASD datasets with a specific naming 
convention.  That convention could be used just as easily for the DVD files.

> >using DVDs would be more attractive.  ...
> >
> Where would you mount the DVDs?  IBM needs to address this.  If IBM says,

The same place we mount them now, on a PC.

> "Desktop system,"  IBM better make such a system available, even if only
> through independent vendors, but with requirements rigorously specified.
> (I should be able to go into Best Buy with a printout of IBM's requirements
> and say to the Blue Shirt, "Sell me one of these.")
> 
> >But the ISV products for which we have no choice have always been 
> >problematic.
> Without any "feel" for Unix, we would rather have root canal that go through 
> the
> aggravation of installing a product where every step of the way is completely 
> foreign to us.
> Not to mention, frequently poorly documented and loaded with assumptions that 
> a real
> Unix user would probably find obvious.
> >
> "O, Brave New World..."  How traumatic was your accommodation to
> 31-bit addressing?  

Not a single one of our products or tools had to be modified for 31-bit 
addressing (ditto for 64-bit).  They are still used by the customers in 24-bit 
mode.  We did eventually modify one tool to operate in 31-bit mode to increase 
the size of a GETMAIN used to build an internal table.  But that was a design 
tradeoff rather than rework the product to place the table in a temporary 
dataset.

>But does IBM document packaging requirements
> for ISVs?  Publication number?

Do you mean "Standard Packaging Rules for z/OS-Based Products," SC23-3695-10?
 
> >Mounting cartridges to install a driver system with the stand-alone ICKDSF 
> >and
> ADRDSSU and using that to install ServerPac has always been infinitely 
> easier.  Ditto for
> receiving maintenance.
> >
> Yah.  How would one build a driver system from DVD?  Linux for Intel?  I slip 
> the
> DVD into the slot and click a few times.

John Eells answered this in his Customized Offerings Driver message.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to